Showing posts with label los angeles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label los angeles. Show all posts

UCLA Used by LAPD to Detain Those Arrested at Protest

Royce Hall, UCLA, photo by Alton, 
creative commons license 

UCLA Used by LAPD to Detain Those Arrested at Protest
by Susan Basko, esq

According to the letter below, which states it is from UCLA faculty members, the UCLA campus was used the Los Angeles Police Department to detain people who had been arrested at protests in downtown Los Angeles.

Letter from faculty:

June 2, 2020

Dear Chancellor Block and Executive Vice-Chancellor Carter,

It has come to our attention that last evening, June 1, 2020, a UCLA facility, the Jackie Robinson Stadium, was used by LAPD to detain protesters and process arrests, including arrests of UCLA students. We have heard from the National Lawyers Guild-Los Angeles, arrested UCLA students, and other arrested protesters on this matter.

Testimony from arrested protesters is chilling. Arrested for violation of curfew in downtown Los Angeles, protesters were crowded into LA County Sheriff’s Department buses and brought to UCLA. As they arrived, they looked out of the small windows on these prison buses only to see Bruins logos and signs greeting them at the Jackie Robinson Stadium. Protesters were held on these buses at UCLA for five to six hours, without access to restrooms, food, water, information, or medical attention. Indeed, there was a medical emergency on one of the buses, one that received a response from the fire department several hours later. 

All protocols of social distancing were violated by the LA County Sheriff’s Department and LAPD with protesters deliberately crowded into buses and officers not following rules and recommendations established by the City, the County, and the CDC, including wearing masks. The cruel irony that this took place at a location used as a COVID-19 testing site is not lost on those arrested or on us. 

When protesters were taken off the buses, they were subject to processing in the parking lot of the stadium and then released, which meant that they were directed to find their way home late at night (between 1:30 am and 3:30 am) from the Jackie Robinson Stadium. Without working cell phones and under conditions of curfew, this was a near impossible task, especially for those unhoused Angelenos who had also been arrested for curfew violation for simply being on the streets of downtown Los Angeles and were now marooned at UCLA.

 In addition, protesters, including UCLA students, were arrested in Westwood, again for violation of curfew. They were brought to Jackie Robinson Stadium on LAPD buses after LAPD tried to commandeer a 720 Metro Bus but failed to maneuver it through the streets. We share these details because if you do not already know them, you must know them now.

We write to express our deep concern about these events and the matter of UCLA collaboration with LAPD and other police forces. In recent days, UCLA leadership has shared statements of solidarity denouncing institutionalized racism and recognizing the importance of protest against such racism.

Last night’s use of Jackie Robinson Stadium stands in sharp hypocrisy to these statements. We have heard from our students and we agree that such solidarity statements must be accompanied not by collaboration with the police but by concrete steps that move us towards the divestment of UCLA from LAPD and other forms of policing, similar to the prompt action taken by the President of the University of Minnesota following the murder of Mr. George Floyd. In the coming months, we intend to work towards this goal in partnership with student and community organizations. We look forward to being in dialogue and alliance with you on this.

That said, we also seek a full accounting of the events of last evening. The Jackie Robinson Stadium is a UCLA facility, implicating all of us in the use of that space to detain protestors and process arrests. It is our understanding that UCLA holds the lease to the Jackie Robinson Stadium and its parking lots, which sit on VA grounds. We ask for a detailed, public statement on the chain of events, decisions, and command lines that led to the use of this facility by LAPD and its mobile processing units last evening and a copy of any agreements that may govern LAPD’s use of this UCLA facility. We also ask for an immediate cessation of the use of this facility or any other UCLA facility by LAPD and other police forces.

Last evening, UCLA students were arrested for engaging in the constitutionally protected right to peacefully protest against racial injustice, which is pervasive in American policing. They were detained and processed at a stadium on their own campus named after Jackie Robinson, an icon of the long and unfinished struggle for Black freedom. Today many of them are trying to complete final examinations and final assignments. This is not the UCLA education and experience that they deserve.

But this is not just about our students. As UCLA faculty, we refuse to allow our university to serve as a police outpost at this moment of national uprising and at any other time. As a public university, we serve the public and our students, and this in turn requires dismantling the mechanisms of punishment that have historically caused undeniable harm to communities in Los Angeles.

A few days ago, we were glad to read your statement which noted: "Still, we recognize that UCLA also can and must do better. As campus leaders, we recommit ourselves to ensuring that our policies and actions value the lives, safety and dignity of every Bruin." This is our chance to do better.

We look forward to receiving a full and detailed accounting of last evening’s incident and to working with you and the rest of the UCLA leadership on divestment from collaborations with LAPD and other police forces.

[signed by dozens of UCLA faculty and administrators]

Crowd Management and Civil Disobedience

Crowd Management and Civil Disobedience
by Sue Basko

Back in 2003,  police in some major California counties and cities used this manual to learn how to respond to civil disobedience (an unlawful event with a demonstration), unlawful assemblies, and riots.   The booklet is a little old, but it is still useful to see how these things are planned.   Actually, this is golden, and anyone planning to run or participate in a big protest in California should read it.


Topics include chemical agents, dispersal orders, and use of force.  The booklet also gives a very comprehensive list of Penal Code sections that are often used in crowd or riot situations, which includes the now infamous Lynching section.

Needless to say, but I am saying it anyway, recent video out of the Oakland and San Francisco areas show police whacking people with bully clubs just because they can, and firing weapons at people who are standing around doing nothing.  Someone sign them up for a course in crowd management, please.  The West Coast is starting to look way too much like a scene out of a despot-run nation.

Protesters should also learn from these booklets that if they want to avoid turning demonstrations into meaningless "police vs protesters" dramas,  they can actually conduct protests in such a way that they follow the law.  Imagine that!  Being peaceful and law-abiding does not give the same adrenaline rush as starting things on fire or laying down in traffic, but it might be more effective protest.  It is normal boring people who are usually in positions of power to change things, so you may want to appeal to their sensibilities.

For more information about what police do in protest situations, please see:

Anonymous vs PERF, where you can download the PERF report.  
This gives useful information on police best practices nationwide.

Detailed, comprehensive, well-written.   A must-read for the protest planner. 


Occupying L.A. Metro Stations

Occupying L.A. Metro Stations
by Sue Basko

Someone attending an Occupy Los Angeles GA (General Assembly) proposed holding meetings at a Metro Station.  At first I thought, that's ludicrous.  Then, I looked into it some more and it may not be so ludicrous, even though it will be hard to follow the rules.

Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa promised the Occupy LA folks that a certain staircase area of City Hall would always be available as a free speech forum.  Rather than have that be true, the group has been subjected to police interference that inhibits or chills free speech.

I also checked into meeting rooms at public libraries and park districts.  These charge a rental fee and require insurance.  Also, most of these rooms are too small for a GA, which is open to anyone.  So where are large groups supposed to gather, free of charge, for purposes of conducting a free speech meeting?

Holding a GA at the ground level of a Metro Station might be possible, if the station outdoor area is large enough.  Read all the rules carefully and see if the place and activity can meet the rules.  Proper planning is the key.  Bring a measuring tape and the rules and see if you find a station location that meets the distance requirements in Section 6-05-210, which you can see below in the Solicitation section.

Click to download the 

ALL parts of the Metro Code of Conduct apply.  It should be read in full by each person before attending or running any such meeting.  The specific parts that are most applicable to this proposal are these:

NO LOUD NOISE:

6-05-150 Noise.
The following acts are prohibited in Metro facilities and vehicles:
A.
Disturbing others by engaging in boisterous or unruly behavior.30
B.
Creating noise, including unnecessary cell phone or other conversation, that is so loud, lengthy, sexually explicit, threatening, violent, or disruptive, that is causes a nuisance or unreasonably interferes with the use, operation, or enjoyment of the Metro facilities or vehicles for Metro representatives or patrons, or creates an unsafe condition, such as distracting operators of Metro vehicles.30
C.
Playing a sound device, except when using headphones or earphones that make the sound inaudible to others unless a permit has been issued for usage of such sound device by Metro.31


NO CAMPING:

6-05-120 Loitering.
A.
Loitering is prohibited in Metro facilities and vehicles.27
B.
Loitering includes the following:
1. Storing personal property in a Metro facility or vehicle.
2. Camping or sleeping in a Metro facility or vehicle when not riding for a transportation purpose.28
3. Remaining in a Metro facility or vehicle without lawful transportation purpose or refusing to provide identification.29

TIME, PLACE AND MANNER RESTRICTIONS ON FIRST AMENDMENT FREE SPEECH ACTIVITY:

6-05-210 Solicitation.
A. No person shall solicit money or other things of value in a Metro facility or vehicle.37
B. No person shall solicit public support, or distribute materials, for any cause in Metro vehicles and in underground or non-public areas of Metro facilities where the distribution is disruptive, presents a safety hazard, or impedes the movement of Metro patrons.
C. The exercise of freedom of speech is permitted in Metro facilities and vehicles, subject to the following restrictions:
1.
Activity at a rail station is limited to street level areas and areas which are not platform waiting areas for patrons.
2.
Activity may not occur within fifteen (15) feet of an elevator, escalator, stairwell or staircase entryway, above-ground platform, loading zone, kiosk, transit entrance or exit, emergency exit or telephone, fare vending machine, or fare media readers or validators, or customer service station.
3.
Activity may not impede transit services or the movement of patrons or Metro personnel.
4.
Pamphlets and leaflets may not be left unattended in a Metro facility or vehicle.
5.
The carrying of signs or placards larger than thirty (30") inches by thirty (30") inches, in Metro facilities or vehicles is prohibited. Large signs can be folded or rolled up to comply with the 30" by 30" restriction. No pole, stick, or other similar object or device utilized to display a sign shall exceed a length of thirty inches (30"), nor shall such object exceed a thickness of one-quarter inch (1/4") and a width of two inches (2"); or if not generally rectangular in shape, such object shall not exceed three-quarters inch (3/4") at its thickest dimension. This limitation is not intended to prohibit walking canes, crutches, or similar device used for mobility assistance by a person with a disability. No object shall have an exposed sharp pointed end.
6.
Carrying of any such signs or sticks must not to interfere with the movement, seating, or safety of patrons or Metro personnel.
7.
Food and drinks shall not be distributed in Metro facilities or vehicles except by Metro or persons who obtain a permit from Metro.
8. Tables and portable equipment are prohibited, unless approved by Metro.


Kettling: What is it?

Kettling: What is it?
by Sue Basko

See also: Counter-Protesters and Counter-Demonstrators
see also: Masks and Bandannas at Protests

Kettling
at a protest is when police form a cordon and squeeze protesters together to "capture" them.  Kettling is also when police form lines to keep protesters from escaping a certain perimeter.

ALSO - BE SURE TO WATCH THE VIDEOS AT BOTTOM OF PAGE.

Kettling is often illegal and/or dangerous.  If an order to disperse has been called after an unlawful assembly has been declared, the police are supposed let people leave.  Kettling may be considered a human rights violation because while kettled, people are often kept for hours without access to water, food, bathrooms, the ability to communicate with their families, etc.

People kettled in the Occupy protests have then often been kept for many hours without food, water, or toilet use.  Some have been severely beaten by police after being kettled.   Hundreds have had zip-ties placed too tightly on their wrists for many hours.  There are many reports of nerve damage and numbness to hands and fingers.

Police have started to use the term Frozen Zone, probably to try to avoid letting it be known they are engaged in dangerous kettling/ illegal tactics.  Frozen zone is an area into which no one will be let in or out, in other words, this is kettling with a set perimeter.  There can be smaller kettling within a frozen zone.  The idea of the existence of a frozen zone is also used by police as an excuse or reason to keep journalists and reporters out.  (At Chicago NATO 2012, the Federal Protective Service (FPS) used the term "Red Zone" to describe an area with many federal buildings that were being heavily guarded by the FPS, but movement within the zone was not restricted.)

Los Angeles November 2011: At the November 30, 2011 raid on Occupy L.A., an order to disperse was called for the park area.  Those not wishing to be arrested were told to leave.  A few hours later, a second order to disperse was called on a nearby street.  Many people have reported that, as they tried to leave, they were kettled by cordons of police.  Many people were arrested and/or beaten as they tried to leave.  These people left the area they were told to leave, only to meet up with traps laid for them blocks away.  Others were immediately trapped and arrested as they tried to follow the order to leave.  Please note there was no protester violence or property damage.  Scroll down to bottom of this page to watch video of woman describe her experience in the LA raid kettling.

Why?  In the Los Angeles situation, it appears the police were trying to get arrest numbers up to justify the expense of a huge raid involving 1400 officers in riot gear, helicopters,  etc.   The only way to do this was to arrest peaceful people simply trying to leave.   There is no other plausible explanation, since there was no violence or property damage occurring and no logical reason to keep people from freely leaving the area.  In this incident, the LAPD used the term frozen zone to explain their kettling tactics.

Oakland January 30, 2012:  In Oakland on January 30, 2012, police kettled hundreds of protesters on a street outside a YMCA.  A police officer announced over a loudspeaker that the people were under arrest for failure to disperse from an unlawful assembly and that the protesters were given 3 prior warnings and were now under arrest.  Spencer Mills, aka Oakfosho, reported that he heard no such warnings being given, and his  video coverage audio is in agreement that no such warnings were given, or were not given to that particular group in that location.   Out of the approximately 400 arrests that day, only 12 have resulted in charges being filed.  It certainly sounds as if about 380 people were arrested and subjected to hours of torment followed by hours or days in jail -- for no particular or legal reason.

Staying Safe:  You are more likely to stay safe at a protest if you avoid being near provocateur types.  Police will target in on them and you may be caught in the cauldron.  If you are near such people, move far away from them.  Also keep in mind that such provocateurs may be police plants.

If it is a sidewalk protest, stay on the sidewalk; do not walk into the street.  If someone is leading people into the street, it is a provocateur or police plant or just bad leadership.  In any case, there is no logical reason to follow.

Safety from Police.   When the police are creating lines of officers to keep people from leaving a protest, as was done at the Occupy L.A. eviction, it is confusing as to what to do.  Some people have reported that they politely cooperated as they were detained by a line of police,  only to find themselves being arrested and sent to jail for several days on bogus charges.  Their physical safety and human rights were violated while in custody.  Others ran to flee and were beaten.  Others maneuvered cleverly enough to evade capture.   In such a situation, it helps to have quick-thinking ninja skills.  It seems there are no right answers when wrong things are happening, and you need to do what you can to protect your own safety.

It seems a full outside investigation should be done on this L.A. incident. In other kettling incidents worldwide, there have been investigations and lawsuits.  Kettling is often considered illegal and a violation of human rights.  

 Wikipedia has a good article about other kettling incidents.






Permits for Protest Marches



Permits for Protest Marches
by Sue Basko


U.S. Constitution First Amendment 
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

When we protest, this is what we are doing -- exercising our freedom of speech, peaceably assembling, and petitioning the Government for a redress of grievances.

Please note the word "peaceably."  This blog tells how to peaceably assemble for a protest.

Although we have the right to free speech protest, our local laws are allowed to limit the time, place and manner of such protests, to balance the rights of others and the safety of the community.

This blog aims to take the mystery and fear out of public protest.  

Public Protest Primer


The safest bet in choosing a legal location to hold a public protest is a march on a public sidewalk or a rally (gathering) in a publicly-owned plaza adjacent to a government building.

 Most public protest takes the form of marches.  This is when a group of people gather and walk, often holding signs or chanting refrains, usually in a call-and-response style, or singing.

A rally is a gathering of protesters in one place, usually to listen to speakers, play and listen to music, etc.  Often, a march ends or begins with a rally.  A rally is often held in a public plaza or on a closed-off street.  A rally almost always requires a permit and significant advance planning, since items such as stages must be inspected for structural safety, toilets must be provided, and traffic usually must be rerouted.  A simple rally in a public plaza, without structures, may not require a permit.

We can protest march on the public way without a permit, as long as we let others also use the sidewalk and as long the protest does not interfere with the normal flow of traffic.  This generally means that your protest can take up half the width of the public sidewalk or part of a public plaza.  That brings up two topics: 1) What is the public way?  and 2) What interferes with the normal flow of traffic?

Update, July 2019: Three additional points that were left out of the original version of this post: 

1) If a protest is taking place spontaneously and rapidly in response to something that happened, international law says that protesters have the right to take the streets.  However, keep in mind, the local police may not agree. 

2) There is a big difference in planning a protest for 100 or fewer people versus planning a protest where you expect thousands of people to attend.  If you are planning a protest where you expect a very large gathering of people, then a permit is more likely required.  You should plan your location and logistics in accord with the city services you will require, such as police, EMTs, a reserved plaza and/or streets blocked to traffic, plans for porta-potties, for which a permit is always required if they are placed on public land. Other things that spark the need for a permit include: a stage, a platform, a large tent, hanging large banners, a sound system, handing out food -- basically anything that can collapse, catch fire, or make someone ill.  These require a permit and usually require a public inspection for safety, just as would be done for a carnival or street fair.  In fact, if you are planning a big protest rally, you are best off to think of it as an event akin to a street fair.  A protest rally has more First Amendment protections than a street fair, but the logistics can be quite similar.  

Also, consider your location -- in a small town, a protest that draws 100 people is a big deal.  In a large city, such as Chicago, Los Angeles, or New York, there are multiple good-sized protests happening every day!  Any protest, no matter the size, is meaningful and important.  

3) Think of how those in wheelchairs can access your protest march or rally.  Think about parents with kids in strollers or walking.  Think about the elderly.  Think about those needing bathrooms.  Make these things part of your planning from the outset.  Try to have donated bottled water available for those who did not bring their own.  Try to plan any march so that it loops around and ends where it began -- so that people can easier get to their forms of transportation, whether it is a car, bike, train, bus, etc.  

What is the Public Way?

The public way is the publicly-owned sidewalk.  In some cities and towns, there are also publicly-owned plazas, and those are usually the public way.

What is Not the Public Way?

The public way does not include sidewalk owned by a private owner, such as a business or office or store.  Shopping malls are not the public way.  (Note: There are some free speech  rights in shopping malls in California and New Jersey.  These come not from the U.S. Constitution, but from the State Constitutions as interpreted by the State Courts.  Therefore, these are not "First Amendment" rights , because they do not arise out of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.  Please consult a lawyer and read:  Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions on Peaceable Assembly.  In reality today in California, I think these rights are essentially theoretical, because California shopping malls today take steps to make their malls places to which customers are invited, but the general public is not.  Also, malls in California have instituted their own permitting processes and time, place, and manner restrictions.  Also, these free speech rights are probably not for "big box" stores, but for traditional malls where there is space that is analogous to the public way.)

Privately-owned plazas are not the public way.  Even if the public is generally invited to a space, such as a plaza, if it is privately owned, your First Amendment free speech rights do not extend there. (Please see the note above about the California shopping mall exception, which arises from the California Constitution, not the First Amendment.)   This can differ in a POP --  a privately-owned public space, which is an area for the public created in exchange for getting higher density in a zoning deal.  If you want to protest in a POP, talk with a lawyer.   Most shopping malls and plazas do not allow signs to be carried onto the property, do not allow anyone to pass out flyers, and do not allow protests.   They can kick you out for doing such things, or they can have you arrested if you refuse to leave or if you return.  (Again, see the California exception to this.)  

Are There Limits on Protesting on Public Property?

Yes, generally you cannot protest outside of a person's house. (This can be different for a public official.  Keep in mind that if the house is located in a residential area, there can be strict limits on noise, parking, etc. ) Illinois Criminal Code 720ILCS 5/ Art.21.1) specifically prohibits "picketing" outside anyone's residence, other than outside your own.  Other states may have similar laws.   There may also be limits on protesting outside of someone's place of business; harassment is not a protected form of speech, so what you are protesting and why you have chosen the location do matter.  Also, many locations limit or prohibit protesting outside a medical facility.   Many publicly-owned schools, especially grammar and high schools, do not allow protesters on the property.  There may be limits in parks; most cities require a permit to hold a protest in a park if the group has more than a given number of participants.  Common numbers are 25 or 50.  Check the municipal law.  Most parks contain protest activity to certain locations.  Most parks also limit or prohibit the use of sound amplifying devices, such as amplifiers or megaphones. You need to check the local laws and the rules regulating a place.  If you plan to hold a protest in such a place, you would be wise to consult with a lawyer first.

What Interferes with Traffic? 

We have the right to march in protest, and we usually do not need a permit to do so, unless we will interfere with the normal flow of traffic.  What does this mean?  Usually it means one of four things:

1) If you actually walk or stand in the street, you are interfering with traffic.  If your protest requires street closure, you need a permit.  

Think about this: If streets must be closed, traffic must be rerouted.  Bus routes and stops will have to be rerouted.  Signs will have to be posted in advance so bus riders know what to expect.  Driveways may need to be closed off.  Bicyclists will need to find different routes.  Businesses will be inconvenienced or lose business.  Schools may have students whose parents cannot reach them to pick them up.  If there are medical facilities on the proposed route, patients can be inconvenienced or endangered by not having access to the clinic or hospital.  If there is a fire station, you may be blocking its driveway.   Parking will have to be banned from the streets for that day.   Public works, such as working on cable, sewers, trees, or trash pick-up, will not be able to take place on those streets during your in-street protest.  ALL this needs to be planned and coordinated well in advance.  Your route will have to chosen very carefully.  In most locations, there is a "usual route" that is used for protests.  It is based on the factors just mentioned.

As you can see, an enormous amount of planning goes into closing off streets for a protest. 

2) If you will have a lot of people marching on the sidewalk, and if crossing the streets at the crosswalks is going to cause traffic flow to slow or halt, you may or may not need a permit.  If everyone in your march faithfully stops at each crosswalk and only walks when it is their turn, then you are not interfering with the flow of traffic.  However, if you are planning for a big group, it is wise to seek a permit.  You may also want to assign your own crossing guards.  Sometimes the local police will act as crossing guards.

3) If your group requires lots of parking spots and many cars will be circling around while the drivers look for spots, this might be considered interfering with the flow of traffic, if this is unusual for that location.  Check the laws of the local municipalities on whether you need a permit.

4) If the protesters are waving at cars or engaging in acts that will cause a stop-and-gawk response from car drivers, this can be considered interfering with traffic.  This, of course, depends on what is planned and how unusual it is for that area.  For example, if you are planning some sort of die-in or costumes or any other activity that may alarm viewers, then traffic should probably be diverted so there are no accidents.  Or the protest may need to be moved to a location without traffic.   Even though you do not plan to be in the street, if you are planning  something that could distract drivers, you should get a permit, because the nature of what you are doing is likely to interfere with traffic flow.

The issue came up of whether it is allowable to stand on a highway overpass to try to get the attention of drivers.  Driver distraction is the #1 cause of highway deaths.  This activity, of course, interferes with traffic -- that is the purpose of it.  A permit would be needed and it is highly unlikely one would ever be granted since that would be granting a permit to endanger lives.  We have the right to protest; we do not have the right to endanger lives.  Also, keep in mind that even if you have a legal right to protest, if the way you are protesting causes anyone to be injured, you can be sued for their injuries.

What Is a Protest Permit All About?

Local laws regulate the time, place and manner of protests.   This includes reserving a space for your group; helping you plan your route so it does not interfere with other events and uses; closing streets if needed; letting you know how much noise you can make at that time and location; providing police escorts if needed, especially to block traffic;  protecting your group and separating you from any opposing groups that plan to come and counter-protest; making sure there are adequate toilets and clean-up planned; arranging for City clean-up crews; and inspecting the safety of any stages or platforms or large props or other potentially dangerous items being used. 

The whole object of a protest permit is to make your protest successful and safe.

How to Get a Permit to Hold a Protest

Permits are issued by municipalities -- that is, cities and towns and suburbs.  You should contact them well in advance.  If you have trouble getting a permit or feel you are being denied one for unfair reasons, you should talk with a lawyer.  It is generally illegal for a municipality to charge an application fee for a permit for a First Amendment protest (except some charge fees for an application for a big protest that is more like a "parade."  However, a municipality may charge you for clean-up or repairs or other costs, if they would charge similarly for other groups and events.

Some cities charge an application fee for permits for a big protest that will close streets.  Some cities require those holding a large protest to have insurance coverage for the event. 

Please note that some experts in freedom of assembly say it is illegal for a municipality or other government entity to charge any fees for a large protest -- such as an application fee, insurance, clean-up, or being billed for police services, etc.  If you are planning a large protest, check into the practices in your area and consult with a local lawyer familiar with protest laws.

A municipality is allowed to deny you a permit to hold a big protest event if you or your group have a bad track record or if it seems  like you do not have the ability to successfully run your event.  Such things can be a past history of violating laws during your protests, past history of property damage, past history of blocking traffic,  past history of leaving flyers or stickers and trash, and other such things.  They will also look at how realistic your plans seem.  For example, if you want to block a mile of streets, and it sounds as if you may only have 100 people, they are not going to let you do that.  You can walk on the sidewalks for that.  Are your plans legal, feasible, safe, and workable?   Are you, your organization, and your people responsible?

Also, usually the office that handles the permits will want to talk in person to the main people of the group seeking the permit.  They will want to see if you seem logical, coherent, and well-organized.   Their concern will be whether it seems likely that you can run your protest in a safe and legal manner, without danger to the safety of people or damage to property. 

Steps to Getting a Permit for a Protest 

Check with the municipality where you plan to hold the protest.  Phone them and talk.  Most will want you to fill out a detailed application.  Many will want to meet with you in person.  If you are denied a permit, there is an appeals process.  Ask what it is and do it.   If you feel you are denied wrongly and need help, contact a local lawyer and ask for their help.

Protest Permits in Los Angeles

Los Angeles asks that permits be applied for 40 days in advance.  Any permits applied for less than 5 days in advance are routinely denied.  In Los Angeles, the same police office handles First Amendment permits and Film Location permits.  Other Special Events permits are handled by a different permits office.  Protest marches and film shoots both close off streets, interfere with traffic, make noise -- and cannot interfere with each other.

To get a protest permit in Los Angeles, you should fill out this
  L.A. PERMIT APPLICATION and bring it to:

Los Angeles Police Department
Special Events Permit Unit
1149 South Broadway, 5th Floor, Stop 932
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Phone: (213) 847-1640
Fax: (213) 847-1797 

Getting a Permit in Other Municipalities 
The first step in planning for a protest is to read the local municipal code of the place where you plan to hold the protest.  Many of these are online. Most likely, you will find it online linked to the official website of the city, town, or suburb.  If you cannot find that, google on the name of the town, the state, and the words "municipal code."   


You will want to read the pertinent parts of the municipal code.   For starters, look through the Code's Table of Contents for such sections as:  Permits, Public Assemblies, First Amendment, Protests and Parades, Streets and Public Ways, Noise, Sound, Amplifiers, Camping (if you plan an occupation),  Special Events, and other such possible topic headings.

Here is a link to municipal codes of many California cities: 


The second step is to call the offices of the municipality and say you want to get a permit.  They will tell you how to go about this.  If you are given a run-around, persist.  If you cannot make headway, persist some more or talk with a lawyer.


Sum Up on How to Get a Protest Permit

1. Determine if you need a permit.  If you are staying on the sidewalk or on a public plaza and you don't have a huge crowd, you probably do not need a permit.  If you will interfere with the normal flow of traffic, you will need a permit.  If you plan to hold a large event in a park or plaza, you most likely need a permit.

2. Find the municipal code online and read the pertinent parts.  Search on applicable words and scan the entire Table of Contents.

3. If an application is required, find it online or go in person and get it and study it.  Figure out your answers.   

4.  Call the municipality and say you want a permit.  Ask about the process.

5. Fill out the application, go to the meeting with the officials in charge of permits, and follow through on what they tell you.

6. If you are denied a permit, find out how to appeal and decide if you want to do that.

7. Try to find a local lawyer to assist you, if needed.